From Plant Press Vol. 16 no. 2
By Sylvia Orli, guest contributor
IT Manager
The latest buzz term in natural history is “connecting
content.” We see the term used officially in certain contexts, such as the
California Academy of Science’s collaborative initiative to digitize natural
history field notes and connect them to natural history collections and
Biodiversity Heritage Library publications. But connecting content can also refer to projects which connect
concepts in various content areas. In the US National Herbarium, we are using
our KE EMu (Electronic Museum) data system to store different types of content,
such as specimen data, photo images, mapping coordinates, and genetic voucher
details, which connect to each other and to outside content. To date, we have
nearly 1.2 million specimen descriptive records, 300,000 geocoded collection
localities, and 185,000 specimen images and live plant images in EMu and
available online.
With these resources, we can illustrate botanical taxonomic and geographic
checklists with both live images and plant specimen images, create locality
maps of our collections, and connect our botanical research to our herbarium
collections through the use of online tools.
The original 1856 botanical illustration of “Echinocactus (Sclerocactus) whipplei” drawn by Paulus Roetter, above, is housed at the National Museum of Natural History, whereas the type specimen is at the herbarium of the Missouri Botanical Garden.
Sometimes the merits of connecting our botanical content into
one data storage system are shown to us in surprising ways. For example, this
year we will be importing our botanical art images into EMu. Alice Tangerini,
our botanical illustrator, discovered that the Department of Botany has most of
the original botanical illustrations from the Report of the Expedition of the
35
th Parallel, “Explorations and Surveys of a Railroad Route from
the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean,” published in 1856
. The
exploration was funded by the U.S. Secretary of War and led by A.W. Whipple of
the Corps of Topographical Engineers and accompanied by botanists, George
Engelmann and J. M. Bigelow of St. Louis. The expedition was part of an
initiative of the U.S. government to find a railroad route from the Mississippi
to the Pacific Ocean.
If the Department of Botany had the original report
drawings, shouldn’t we also have the specimens from the expedition? The notion
of combing the herbarium for specimens from this expedition to match the
drawings seemed daunting, as 70 percent of the herbarium specimens are not
inventoried. But Botany has also embarked on the Historical Collections project, an effort to document the botanical
explorations in the US National Herbarium and digitize the collections
associated with the expeditions as part of the Global Plants Initiative (GPI). By
querying the name of the expedition in our EMu system, we were able to retrieve
71 records and specimen images for the Whipple expedition and match many of
them to the original illustrations. A score for both the Whipple Expedition
illustrations and specimens! We could now digitally connect the illustrations
to their voucher specimen records.